4.7 Review

What influences the implementation of natural climate solutions? A systematic map and review of the evidence

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac4071

关键词

natural climate solutions; nature-based solutions; climate change policy; land-based mitigation; systematic review; systematic mapping; global environmental assessment

资金

  1. ElsaNeumann-Scholarship of the State of Berlin
  2. RESTORE+ project, International Climate Initiative - Federal Ministry for the Environment
  3. Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, and Nuclear Safety (BMU)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Emerging research highlights the potential of natural climate solutions (NCS) for greenhouse gas mitigation, but implementation is influenced by various factors. The literature mainly focuses on tropical regions and forest landscapes, with factors such as indigenous and local community engagement, performance-based finance, and technical assistance driving NCS implementation. However, the specific combination and adoption of factors vary globally and within countries, emphasizing the need for nuanced interpretation and understanding of research findings.
Emergingresearch points to large greenhouse gas mitigation opportunities for activities that are focused on the preservation and maintenance of ecosystems, also known as natural climate solutions (NCS). Despite large quantifications of the potential biophysical and carbon benefits of these activities, these estimates hold large uncertainties and few capture the socio-economic bounds. Furthermore, the uptake of NCS remains slow and information on the enabling factors needed for successful implementation, co-benefits, and trade-offs of these activities remain underrepresented at scale. As such, we present a systematic review that synthesizes and maps the bottom-up evidence on the contextual factors that influence the implementation of NCS in the peer-reviewed literature. Drawing from a large global collection of (primarily case study-based, N = 211) research, this study (1) clarifies the definition of NCS, including in the context of nature-based solutions and other ecosystem-based approaches to addressing climate change; (2) provides an overview of the current state of literature, including research trends, opportunities, gaps, and biases; and (3) critically reflects on factors that may affect implementation in different geographies. We find that the content of the reviewed studies overwhelmingly focuses on tropical regions and activities in forest landscapes. We observe that implementation of NCS rely, not on one factor, but a suite of interlinked enabling factors. Specifically, engagement of indigenous peoples and local communities, performance-based finance, and technical assistance are important drivers of NCS implementation. While the broad categories of factors mentioned in the literature are similar across regions, the combination of factors and how and for whom they are taken up remains heterogeneous globally, and even within countries. Thus our results highlight the need to better understand what trends may be generalizable to inform best practices in policy discussions and where more nuance may be needed for interpreting research findings and applying them outside of their study contexts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据