4.7 Article

A 30 m global map of elevation with forests and buildings removed

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 17, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac4d4f

关键词

digital elevation model; bare-earth; terrain; remote sensing; machine learning

资金

  1. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) [NE/S3003061/1]
  2. Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) [NE/S3003061/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article introduces a method that uses machine learning to remove buildings and forests from the Copernicus Digital Elevation Model, generating a more accurate global map of elevation. By training the algorithm with unique reference elevation data from 12 countries, the method significantly reduces vertical errors in built-up areas and forests. The resulting elevation map is more accurate than existing global elevation maps.
Elevation data are fundamental to many applications, especially in geosciences. The latest global elevation data contains forest and building artifacts that limit its usefulness for applications that require precise terrain heights, in particular flood simulation. Here, we use machine learning to remove buildings and forests from the Copernicus Digital Elevation Model to produce, for the first time, a global map of elevation with buildings and forests removed at 1 arc second (similar to 30 m) grid spacing. We train our correction algorithm on a unique set of reference elevation data from 12 countries, covering a wide range of climate zones and urban extents. Hence, this approach has much wider applicability compared to previous DEMs trained on data from a single country. Our method reduces mean absolute vertical error in built-up areas from 1.61 to 1.12 m, and in forests from 5.15 to 2.88 m. The new elevation map is more accurate than existing global elevation maps and will strengthen applications and models where high quality global terrain information is required.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据