On the effect of reference periods on trends in percentile-based extreme temperature indices

A number of studies have noted that the use of distinct reference periods when comparing indices measuring the frequency of days exceeding a particular temperature percentile threshold leads to apparently different behaviour. We show that these differences arise because of the interplay between the increasing temperatures and the choice of reference period. The time series of the indicators calculated using the different reference periods are offset, as expected, but also diverge. Linear trends calculated over the same period from the same underlying data but where different reference periods have been used are substantially different if a change in climatological conditions has occurred between the two reference periods. We show this not only occurs in our simple empirical approach, but also for the averages of gridded observational and reanalysis datasets and also at a station level. This has implications for data set comparisons using trends in temperature percentile indices that are based on different reference periods. It also has implications for updates to standard reference periods used to monitor the climate.

Automated summary

Using distinct reference periods for comparing temperature percentile indices leads to apparent differences in behavior due to the interplay between increasing temperatures and the choice of reference period. Linear trends calculated using different reference periods can differ substantially if climatological conditions change between the two periods, as shown in our study using various datasets.