4.7 Article

Cu2O/Fe3O4/MIL-101(Fe) nanocomposite as a highly efficient and recyclable visible-light-driven catalyst for degradation of ciprofloxacin

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
卷 201, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111593

关键词

MIL-101(Fe); Ciprofloxacin; Photocatalytic degradation; Visible light

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study synthesized a novel Cu2O/Fe3O4/MIL-101(Fe) nanocomposite for the efficient degradation of ciprofloxacin antibiotics in wastewater. The nanocomposite exhibited excellent catalytic stability and recyclability, achieving a degradation efficiency of 99.2% under optimal conditions.
Nowadays, the widespread production and use of antibiotics have increased their presence in wastewater systems, posing a potential threat to the environment and human health. The development of advanced materials for treating antibiotics in wastewater has always received special attention. This study aimed to synthesize a novel Cu2O/Fe3O4/MIL-101(Fe) nanocomposite and use it to degrade ciprofloxacin (CIP) antibiotics in an aqueous solution under visible light irradiation. The optical, structural, and morphological attributes of the developed nanocomposite were analyzed by XRD, FTIR, FE-SEM, TGA, DRS, BET, VSM, and UV-Vis techniques. Optimum circumstances for CIP photocatalytic degradation were acquired in 0.5 g L-1 of catalyst dosage, pH of 7, and CIP concentration of 20 mg L-1. The degradation efficiency was achieved 99.2% after 105 min of irradiation in optimum circumstances. The chemical trapping experiments confirmed that hydroxyl and superoxide radicals significantly contributed to the CIP degradation process. The results of this study indicated that Cu2O/ Fe3O4/MIL-101(Fe) nanocomposite was a highly stable photocatalyst that could effectively remove antibiotics from aqueous solutions. The CIP degradation efficiency only decreased by 6% after five cycles, indicating the excellent recyclability of Cu2O/Fe3O4/MIL-101(Fe) nanocomposites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据