4.7 Article

Au-SnO2-CdS ternary nanoheterojunction composite for enhanced visible light-induced photodegradation of imidacloprid

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
卷 201, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111586

关键词

Nanoheterojunction; LED; Photocatalysis; Imidacloprid

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel synthetic strategy was developed to fabricate Au-SnO2-CdS ternary nanoheterojunction catalyst for LED light derived photocatalytic degradation of imidacloprid. The synthesized ternary nanocomposite showed high degradation efficiency and a pseudo-first-order reaction rate. The effect of parameters like contact time, initial pollutant concentration, and pH on degradation efficiency was investigated, and comparative studies with pristine materials were conducted.
Herein, we have developed a novel synthetic strategy for the fabrication of Au-SnO2-CdS ternary nanoheterojunction catalyst and its utility towards LED light derived photocatalytic degradation of imidacloprid has been evaluated. The synthesized ternary nanocomposite was characterized using sophisticated analytical techniques to evaluate the catalyst's morphological, structural and surface chemical properties. The photo catalytic activity of the ternary catalyst towards the degradation of imidacloprid was evaluated under LED irradiation. Approximately 95% of the degradation efficiency was achieved with a pseudo-first-order reaction rate of 15.6 x 10(-3) min(-1). The degradation efficiency of Au-SnO2-CdS nano-catalyst was found to be similar to 1.2, 1.4 and 2.1 times to that of the pristine Au, CdS and SnO2 nanomaterials under similar experimental conditions. The effect of variation of parameters like contact time, initial pollutant concentration and pH on degradation efficiency has also been investigated. Moreover, the identification of various degradation products and reactive intermediates were made with high-performance liquid chromatography and electron spin resonance techniques.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据