4.7 Article

A multi-objective adaptive surrogate modelling-based optimization algorithm for constrained hybrid problems

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE
卷 148, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105272

关键词

Multi-objective optimization; Surrogate model; Constrained hybrid problem; NSGA-II; MO-ASMO

资金

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA2006040104]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [42101046, 51979004]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M661714]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many multi-objective optimization problems in integrated environmental modeling and management involve complex constraints and different types of decision variables. This study presents an algorithm called MO-ASMOCH that can effectively solve these hybrid problems by using fewer model evaluations and achieving high-quality solutions.
Many multi-objective optimization problems in integrated environmental modelling and management involve not only continuous decision variables but also variables like integers and/or discrete variables. Furthermore, the optimization problems are often subject to various constraints. Solving this kind of constrained hybrid problems usually requires a huge number of model evaluations that can be computationally expensive. This study presents an algorithm known as multi-objective adaptive surrogate modelling-based optimization for constrained hybrid problems (MO-ASMOCH). It incorporates several evolutionary operators to handle different types of decision variables and uses a classification surrogate model to deal with model constraints. MO-ASMOCH was evaluated against the widely used NSGA-II method on three engineering design problems and three water distribution system design problems with up to 30 dimensions. The results showed that MO-ASMOCH is able to obtain nondominated solutions of similar quality as that of NSGA-II using much fewer model evaluations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据