4.7 Article

A modified response matrix method to approximate SWAT for computationally intense applications

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE
卷 148, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105269

关键词

Surrogate modeling; Nutrient transport; Watershed modeling; Soil and water assessment tool (SWAT); Management decisions

资金

  1. US National Science Foundation (INFEWS/T1 award) [1739788]
  2. [INFEWS/T1]
  3. Directorate For Geosciences
  4. Division Of Earth Sciences [1739788] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces a modified response matrix approach to estimate streamflow, nutrient, and sediment export using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). By addressing the interaction effects between conservation practices and in-stream and reservoir processes, the modified approach provides accurate estimation throughout the stream network.
ABS T R A C T The computational burden of running a semi-distributed hydrological model numerous times, such as for opti-mization applications, can be exorbitant. This study provides a surrogate model to estimate streamflow, nutrient, and sediment export under spatially distributed management decisions. Specifically, we surrogate the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) using a modified response matrix (RM) approach. A traditional RM approach applied to SWAT assumes hydrological responses are approximated by linear functions of management decisions, and falls short in accounting for in-stream and reservoir processes. Here, we explain and illustrate three key modifications that address interaction effects between co-located conservation practices and in-stream and reservoir processes affecting nutrient and sediment loads. The modified RM approach provides excellent esti-mation (Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency, NSE >0.95) for streamflow and nutrient export throughout the stream network and provides very good estimation (NSE >0.85) for sediment export at most, though not all, points in the stream network.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据