4.6 Review

Back to our roots: exploring the role of root morphology as a mediator of beneficial plant-microbe interactions

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 24, 期 8, 页码 3264-3272

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.15926

关键词

-

资金

  1. Novo Nordisk Foundation [NNF19SA0059360]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Breeding crops with belowground traits that positively impact the rhizosphere microbiome is a promising strategy for sustainable improvement in crop yields. This review examines the relationship between root architecture and morphology and rhizosphere interactions, focusing on the potential impact of root diameter on the structure and function of the rhizosphere microbiome and discussing the underlying biological and ecological mechanisms. Additionally, three future research directions are proposed to further investigate the effect of belowground traits on rhizosphere microbiology, which may lead to the development of new plant breeding strategies for sustainable and high-yielding crop cultivars.
Plant breeding for belowground traits that have a positive impact on the rhizosphere microbiome is a promising strategy to sustainably improve crop yields. Root architecture and morphology are understudied plant breeding targets despite their potential to significantly shape microbial community structure and function in the rhizosphere. In this review, we explore the relationship between various root architectural and morphological traits and rhizosphere interactions, focusing on the potential of root diameter to impact the rhizosphere microbiome structure and function while discussing the potential biological and ecological mechanisms underpinning this process. In addition, we propose three future research avenues to drive this research area in an effort to unravel the effect of belowground traits on rhizosphere microbiology. This knowledge will pave the way for new plant breeding strategies that can be exploited for sustainable and high-yielding crop cultivars.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据