4.6 Article

Does biological rhythm transmit from plants to rhizosphere microbes?

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 23, 期 11, 页码 6895-6906

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.15820

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21976161, 41907210, 21777144]
  2. Programme for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT_17R97]
  3. Fundacion Ramon Areces (ELEMENTAL-CLIMATE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plant physiological and metabolic processes are regulated by rhythmic gene expression and rhizosphere microorganisms. Deficiencies in the central circadian clock result in abnormal diurnal rhythms for expressed genes and root exudates, causing a lack of coordination between bacterial community and plant growth in clock mutants.
Plant physiological and metabolic processes are modulated by rhythmic gene expression in a large part. Meanwhile, plants are also regulated by rhizosphere microorganisms, which are fed by root exudates and provide beneficial functions to their plant host. Whether the biorhythms in plants would transfer to the rhizosphere microbial community is still uncertain and their intricate connection remains poorly understood. Here, we investigated the role of the Arabidopsis circadian clock in shaping the rhizosphere microbial community using wild-type plants and clock mutants (cca1-1 and toc1-101) with transcriptomic, metabolomic and 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis throughout a 24-h period. Deficiencies of the central circadian clock led to abnormal diurnal rhythms for thousands of expressed genes and dozens of root exudates. The bacterial community failed to follow obvious patterns in the 24-h period, and there was lack of coordination with plant growth in the clock mutants. Our results suggest that the robust rhythmicity of genes and root exudation due to circadian clock in plants is an important driving force for the positive succession of rhizosphere communities, which will feedback on plant development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据