4.5 Article

Identifying Priorities, Targets, and Actions for the Long-term Social and Ecological Management of Invasive Non-Native Species

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 69, 期 1, 页码 140-153

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-021-01541-3

关键词

Alien species; Collaborative process; Expert knowledge; Latin America; Natural resource management planning; Uncertainty

资金

  1. CONTAIN programme under the Latin American Biodiversity Programme, the Newton Fund [NE/S011641/1]
  2. Argentine National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET) [2019-74-APN-DIR]
  3. Brazilian Sao Paulo Research Foundation [FAPESP 2018/14995-8]
  4. Chilean Agency for Research and Development (ANID)
  5. CONICYT PIA [AFB170008]
  6. NERC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Formulating effective management plans for addressing the impacts of invasive non-native species requires a multi-disciplinary approach and stakeholder involvement. By integrating multiple sources of information, clear priorities, targets, and high-level actions can be established to manage the various ecological, social, and economic impacts of invasive species.
Formulating effective management plans for addressing the impacts of invasive non-native species (INNS) requires the definition of clear priorities and tangible targets, and the recognition of the plurality of societal values assigned to these species. These tasks require a multi-disciplinary approach and the involvement of stakeholders. Here, we describe procedures to integrate multiple sources of information to formulate management priorities, targets, and high-level actions for the management of INNS. We follow five good-practice criteria: justified, evidence-informed, actionable, quantifiable, and flexible. We used expert knowledge methods to compile 17 lists of ecological, social, and economic impacts of lodgepole pines (Pinus contorta) and American mink (Neovison vison) in Chile and Argentina, the privet (Ligustrum lucidum) in Argentina, the yellow-jacket wasp (Vespula germanica) in Chile, and grasses (Urochloa brizantha and Urochloa decumbens) in Brazil. INNS plants caused a greater number of impacts than INNS animals, although more socio-economic impacts were listed for INNS animals than for plants. These impacts were ranked according to their magnitude and level of confidence on the information used for the ranking to prioritise impacts and assign them one of four high-level actions-do nothing, monitor, research, and immediate active management. We showed that it is possible to formulate management priorities, targets, and high-level actions for a variety of INNS and with variable levels of available information. This is vital in a world where the problems caused by INNS continue to increase, and there is a parallel growth in the implementation of management plans to deal with them.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据