期刊
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 -出版社
BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12940-021-00806-y
关键词
Sunscreen; Endocrine disruptor; Skin cancer; Benzophenone 3; Intergenerational; Externality; Melanoma; Conflicting interests
资金
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [U01ES026140]
This study aims to develop a set of ethical principles to guide decision-making in environmental health and apply these principles to the specific chemical oxybenzone. We propose six ethical principles, including sustainability, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, community, and precautionary substitution. The case of oxybenzone demonstrates the complexity and importance of decision-making to address the limits of the biosphere's regenerative rates. Both ethical and practical considerations should be taken into account in decisions regarding the widespread use of synthetic compounds.
Background Technological advancements make lives safer and more convenient. Unfortunately, many of these advances come with costs to susceptible individuals and public health, the environment, and other species and ecosystems. Synthetic chemicals in consumer products represent a quintessential example of the complexity of both the benefits and burdens of modern living. How we navigate this complexity is a matter of a society's values and corresponding principles. Objectives We aimed to develop a series of ethical principles to guide decision-making within the landscape of environmental health, and then apply these principles to a specific environmental chemical, oxybenzone. Oxybenzone is a widely used ultraviolet (UV) filter added to personal care products and other consumer goods to prevent UV damage, but potentially poses harm to humans, wildlife, and ecosystems. It provides an excellent example of a chemical that is widely used for the alleged purpose of protecting human health and product safety, but with costs to human health and the environment that are often ignored by stakeholders. Discussion We propose six ethical principles to guide environmental health decision-making: principles of sustainability, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, community, and precautionary substitution. We apply these principles to the case of oxybenzone to demonstrate the complex but imperative decision-making required if we are to address the limits of the biosphere's regenerative rates. We conclude that both ethical and practical considerations should be included in decisions about the commercial, pervasive application of synthetic compounds and that the current flawed practice of cost-benefit analysis be recognized for what it is: a technocratic approach to support corporate interests.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据