4.7 Review

Hydrogen production, storage, utilisation and environmental impacts: a review

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 153-188

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10311-021-01322-8

关键词

Hydrogen production; Life cycle assessment; Hydrogen utilisation; Hydrogen storage; Climate change

资金

  1. OQ Oman [CR/DVC/SERC/19/01]
  2. Bryden Centre project [VA5048]
  3. European Union's INTERREG VA Programme
  4. Centre for Advanced Sustainable Energy (CASE)
  5. NI's Competence Centre Programme
  6. Sustainable Energy Research Centre at Sultan Qaboos University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrogen, also known as dihydrogen, is increasingly recognized as a clean and reliable energy source for various industries. Its production methods are diverse, with water electrolysis being a common method. Storing hydrogen underground can effectively shift energy from off-peak periods to peak periods to meet demand.
Dihydrogen (H-2), commonly named 'hydrogen', is increasingly recognised as a clean and reliable energy vector for decarbonisation and defossilisation by various sectors. The global hydrogen demand is projected to increase from 70 million tonnes in 2019 to 120 million tonnes by 2024. Hydrogen development should also meet the seventh goal of 'affordable and clean energy' of the United Nations. Here we review hydrogen production and life cycle analysis, hydrogen geological storage and hydrogen utilisation. Hydrogen is produced by water electrolysis, steam methane reforming, methane pyrolysis and coal gasification. We compare the environmental impact of hydrogen production routes by life cycle analysis. Hydrogen is used in power systems, transportation, hydrocarbon and ammonia production, and metallugical industries. Overall, combining electrolysis-generated hydrogen with hydrogen storage in underground porous media such as geological reservoirs and salt caverns is well suited for shifting excess off-peak energy to meet dispatchable on-peak demand.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据