4.7 Review

History of titanium dioxide regulation as a food additive: a review

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 20, 期 2, 页码 1017-1033

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10311-021-01360-2

关键词

Titanium dioxide; Exposure; Food additive; Regulation; Nanoparticles

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents the history of titanium dioxide usage, discusses health concerns regarding its use as a food additive, and explores the evolution of regulations related to TiO2 in different periods. The specific roles played by stakeholders are highlighted, along with the shift in regulatory approaches towards nanotechnology in the context of food safety governance. Academic research signaling, along with civil society advocacy for precautionary principles, are seen as influential factors in regulatory decision-making.
Since its discovery in the late eighteenth century and mass production in the early twentieth century, titanium dioxide has been used in a wide range of applications such as paints, cosmetics, energy storage, photocatalysis and food. Health concerns regarding TiO2 use as a food additive, named E171 in Europe, are mainly due to the presence of nanoparticles, whereas it should contain only microparticles. Here we present the history of the increasing use of TiO2 since the end of the Second World War, followed by rising concerns at the beginning of the twenty-first century, until the European decision to ban the use of TiO2 in food in 2022. We discuss the evolution of TiO2 regulation, within the regulation of chemicals products, particularly in Europe. We highlight the specific role played by the stakeholders: regulatory agencies, companies, scientists and associations. Two periods were identified. In the first period (1945-2000), marked by the growing use of chemical products, and of food additives in industry, the regulation of chemical products progressed with the double aim to master and adapt to risks. In the second period, beginning in the 2000s, the regulation of TiO2 as a food additive in Europe has evolved in the context of the regulation of nanotechnology. The liberal approach associating nanotechnologies with progress and the competitiveness of companies and of the economies has gradually been challenged by the accumulation of scientific work pointing out the risks to human health during the last period. In the context of a food safety governance based on the separation of risk assessment and risk management, the TiO2 case reveals the signaling role played by academic work, while civil society groups promote mediatization and can impose the precautionary principle as a basis for this regulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据