4.7 Article

Reduced mesophyll conductance induces photosynthetic acclimation of japonica rice under elevated CO2

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2021.104590

关键词

Elevated CO2; Japonica rice; Limitation; Mesophyll conductance; Photosynthetic acclimation; Quantification

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41530533]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the photosynthetic acclimation of a japonica rice cultivar under elevated CO2 levels, finding that the decrease in photosynthetic rate was mainly limited by mesophyll conductance (g(m)). The results underscore the significant role of g(m) in photosynthetic acclimation under elevated CO2 conditions in rice.
The foliar photosynthetic acclimation to prolonged elevated CO2 has been studied in many ways, but the quantification of photosynthetic acclimation through the limitation of stomatal conductance (g(s)), mesophyll conductance (g(m)) and biochemical capacity (V-camx) is scarce. To quantify photosynthetic acclimation under elevated CO2, a japonica rice cultivar 'Nanjing 9108' was grown at two CO2 levels-ambient CO2 (a[CO2]) and a [CO2] +200 mu mol mol(-1) (e[CO2]) using open top chamber facility. We measured the response of net photosynthetic rate (A(n)) to CO2 at Rubisco (C-c) at jointing, flowering and filling stages based a biochemical C3-photosynthesis model. Measurements at the same CO2 concentration showed that the A(n), under e[CO2] was significantly lower than that under a[CO2] at three developmental stages, suggesting the occurrence of acclimation of photosynthesis. The photosynthetic acclimation is associated with the decrease in g(m), g(s) and V-cmax, and g(m) mainly limits photosynthesis. The contribution of g(m), g(s) and V-camx limitation to photosynthetic acclimation averaged 65 %, 25 % and 10 % of the total reduction in A(n). Our findings demonstrate g(m) is the major driver of photosynthetic acclimation and highlight the role of g(m) under e[CO2] in rice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据