4.8 Article

One and multi-compartments toxico-kinetic modeling to understand metals' organotropism and fate in Gammarus fossarum

期刊

ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL
卷 156, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106625

关键词

Organotropism; Amphipods; Cadmium; Mercury; Toxico-kinetic model; Bayesian Inference

资金

  1. APPROve project - ANR [ANR-18-CE34-0013-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that G. fossarum efficiently takes up Cd and eliminates it more rapidly compared to the mussel M. galloprovincialis. The organs that accumulate and depurate the most concentrations of both metals are the caeca and intestine. The one-compartment TK model is most relevant for Hg, while the multi-compartments TK model fits Cd data better, demonstrating dynamic transfer of Cd among organs.
The use of freshwater invertebrates for biomonitoring has been increasing for several decades, but little is known about relations between external exposure concentration of metals and their biodistribution among different tissues. One and multi-compartments toxicokinetic (TK) models are powerful tools to formalize and predict how a contaminant is bioaccumulated. The aim of this study is to develop modeling approaches to improve knowledge on dynamic of accumulation and fate of Cd and Hg in gammarid's organs. Gammarids were exposed to dissolved metals (11.1 +/- 1.2 mu g.L-1 of Cd or 0.27 +/- 0.13 mu g.L-1 of Hg) before a depuration phase. At each sampling days, their organs (caeca, cephalon, intestine and remaining tissues) were separated by dissection before analyses. Results allowed us to determine that i) G. fossarum takes up Cd as efficiently as the mussel M. galloprovincialis, but eliminates it more rapidly, ii) organs which accumulate and depurate the most, in terms of concentrations, are caeca and intestine for both metals; iii) the one-compartment TK models is the most relevant for Hg, while the multi-compartments TK model allows a better fit to Cd data, demonstrating dynamic transfer of Cd among organs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据