4.8 Article

Phasing out DEHP from plastic indwelling medical devices used for intensive care: Does it reduce the long-term attention deficit of critically ill children?

期刊

ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL
卷 158, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106962

关键词

Critical illness; Children; Medical devices; Plasticizers; DEHP; Attention

资金

  1. European Research Council [AdvG2012-321670, AdvG-2017-785809]
  2. Methusalem program of the Flemish government [METH14/06]
  3. Flanders Institute for Science and Technology [IWT-TBM110685, IWTTBM150181]
  4. Sophia Research Foundation
  5. Stichting Agis Zorginnovatie
  6. Erasmus Trustfonds
  7. European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN research grant)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exposure to DEHP in critically ill children decreased over the years, but this did not result in improved attention 4 years later. Further investigation is needed to determine if the residual exposure may still be toxic or if the alternative plasticizers replacing DEHP are safe for neurodevelopment.
Background: Children who have been critically ill face long-term developmental impairments. Iatrogenic exposure to di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP), a plasticizer leaching from plastic indwelling medical devices used in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), has been associated with the pronounced attention deficit observed in children 4 years after critical illness. As concerns about DEHP toxicity increased, governmental authorities urged the phase out of DEHP in indwelling medical devices and replacement with alternative plasticizers. We hypothesized that exposure to DEHP decreased over the years, attenuating the pronounced long-term attention deficit of these vulnerable children. Methods: We compared plasma concentrations of 3 oxidative DEHP metabolites (5cx-MEPP, 5OH-MEHP, 5oxoMEHP) on the last PICU day in 216 patients who participated in the Tight Glucose Control study (2004-2007) and 334 patients who participated in the PEPaNIC study (2012-2015) and survived PICU stay. Corresponding minimal exposures to these metabolites (plasma concentration multiplied with number of days in PICU) were also evaluated. In patients with 4-year follow-up data, we compared measures of attention (standardized reaction times and consistency). Comparisons were performed with univariable analyses and multivariable linear regression analyses adjusted for baseline risk factors. Results: In the PEPaNIC patients, last PICU day plasma concentrations of 5cx-MEPP, 5OH-MEHP, 5oxo-MEHP and their sum, and corresponding minimal exposures, were reduced to 17-69% of those in the Tight Glucose Control study (p < 0.0001). Differences remained significant after multivariable adjustment (p <= 0.001). PEPaNIC patients did not show better attention than patients in the Tight Glucose Control study, also not after multivariable adjustment for risk factors. Conclusion: Exposure of critically ill children to DEHP in the PICU decreased over the years, but the lower exposure did not translate into improved attention 4 years later. Whether the residual exposure may still be toxic or whether the plasticizers replacing DEHP may not be safe for neurodevelopment needs further investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据