4.6 Article

On the Neutrosophic, Pythagorean and Some Other Novel Fuzzy Sets Theories Used in Decision Making: Invitation to Discuss

期刊

ENTROPY
卷 23, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/e23111485

关键词

novel fuzzy sets theories; intuitionistic fuzzy sets; Dempster-Shafer theory

资金

  1. [BS/PB-1-100-3016/2021/P]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a critical analysis of Neutrosophic, Pythagorean, and other novel fuzzy sets theories is provided, revealing shortcomings and proposing alternative approaches for improvement. The author suggests extending intuitionistic fuzzy sets within the framework of the Dempster-Shafer theory to address the internal problems of Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy sets and enhance upon them.
In this short paper, a critical analysis of the Neutrosophic, Pythagorean and some other novel fuzzy sets theories foundations is provided, taking into account that they actively used for the solution of the decision-making problems. The shortcomings of these theories are exposed. It is stated that the independence hypothesis, which is a cornerstone of the Neutrosophic sets theory, is not in line with common sense and therefore leads to the paradoxical results in the asymptotic limits of this theory. It is shown that the Pythagorean sets theory possesses questionable foundations, the sense of which cannot be explained reasonably. Moreover, this theory does not completely solve the declared problem. Similarly, important methodological problems of other analyzed theories are revealed. To solve the interior problems of the Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy sets and to improve upon them, this being the reason most of the criticized novel sets theories were developed, an alternative approach based on extension of the intuitionistic fuzzy sets in the framework of the Dempster-Shafer theory is proposed. No propositions concerned with the improvement of the Cubic sets theory and Single-Valued Neutrosophic Offset theory were made, as their applicability was shown to be very dubious. In order to stimulate discussion, many statements are deliberately formulated in a hardline form.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据