4.6 Article

A Study on Railway Surface Defects Detection Based on Machine Vision

期刊

ENTROPY
卷 23, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/e23111437

关键词

deep learning; rail surface defect detection; machine vision; YOLOv4; MobileNetV3

资金

  1. General Project of Scientific Research Program of Beijing Municipal Education Commission [KM202010016003]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51975038]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Beijing [KZ202010016025]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traditional machine vision methods are inadequate for the detection of railway surface defects, hence this paper proposes a new method based on an improved YOLOv4, which achieves lightweight network and real-time detection, significantly improving detection accuracy.
The detection of rail surface defects is an important tool to ensure the safe operation of rail transit. Due to the complex diversity of track surface defect features and the small size of the defect area, it is difficult to obtain satisfying detection results by traditional machine vision methods. The existing deep learning-based methods have the problems of large model sizes, excessive parameters, low accuracy and slow speed. Therefore, this paper proposes a new method based on an improved YOLOv4 (You Only Look Once, YOLO) for railway surface defect detection. In this method, MobileNetv3 is used as the backbone network of YOLOv4 to extract image features, and at the same time, deep separable convolution is applied on the PANet layer in YOLOv4, which realizes the lightweight network and real-time detection of the railway surface. The test results show that, compared with YOLOv4, the study can reduce the amount of the parameters by 78.04%, speed up the detection by 10.36 frames per second and decrease the model volume by 78%. Compared with other methods, the proposed method can achieve a higher detection accuracy, making it suitable for the fast and accurate detection of railway surface defects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据