4.7 Article

An improved matrix split-iteration method for analyzing underground water flow

期刊

ENGINEERING WITH COMPUTERS
卷 39, 期 3, 页码 2049-2065

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00366-021-01551-z

关键词

Richards equation; Splitting iteration; Multistep preconditioner; Convergence rate; Acceleration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article proposes an inexact Hermitian and skew-Hermitian splitting iteration method with multistep preconditioner for analyzing underground water flow. The results show that this method can effectively solve unsaturated flow and transient drainage problems, with higher numerical accuracy, faster convergence rate, and higher computational efficiency compared to classical methods.
The Hermitian and skew-Hermitian splitting iteration method (HSS) is commonly an effective linear iterative method for solving sparse non-Hermite positive definite equations. However, it is time-consuming to solve linear equations. Hence, inexact Hermitian and skew-Hermitian splitting iteration approaches with multistep preconditioner (PIHSS(m)) are proposed for analyzing underground water flow. For unsaturated porous media, an exponential model is adopted to linearize the Richards equation. The governing equations are discretized using the finite element method to produce a system of linear equations. Furthermore, the inexact Hermitian and skew-Hermitian splitting iteration methods (IHSS) and PIHSS(m) are used to solve the linear equations. The results show that PIHSS(m) can effectively solve the 1D unsaturated flow problem and 2D transient drainage problem in partially and completely saturated soils. The IHSS has higher numerical accuracy than the classical methods such as Picard method and Gauss-Seidel iterative method. Compared with IHSS, PIHSS(m) achieves faster convergence rate and higher computational efficiency, particularly for solving groundwater flow problems with high grid density. Additionally, the numerical results reveal that PIHSS(m) has excellent acceleration, that is, at least 50% acceleration compared with the IHSS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据