4.7 Article

Protective effects of gabion wall against blast waves from large TNT-equivalent explosions

期刊

ENGINEERING STRUCTURES
卷 249, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113389

关键词

Protective effects; Gabion wall; Blast wave; Large TNT-equivalent explosions; Blast wall

资金

  1. National Nat-ural Science Foundation of China [51978166]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the protective effects of gabion walls against blast waves from large explosives, finding that wall height and blast distance are key factors in blast wave attenuation. An empirical equation characterizing the blast mitigation efficacy of gabion walls was derived based on the study findings.
Gabion walls are considered to be novel, easy-to-transport, and rapidly deployable blast walls. They are widely used to protect military and civilian personnel and equipment in a variety of settings, such as humanitarian and peacekeeping operations. To study the protective effects of gabion wall against blast waves from large TNTequivalent explosions, overpressure measurements are performed around gabion walls with 1 t and 10 t trinitrotoluene (TNT)ground explosion loads in this study. The effects of the stand-off distance and wall height on the back-wall overpressures are analyzed. Numerical simulations are also performed, and the results are validated by comparison to the experimental data and ConWep calculations. It is found that the height and blast distance of the walls are important factors for blast-wave attenuation compared to the wall thickness and wall material. The location where the Mach wave forms behind the wall is determined. An empirical equation that characterizes the blast mitigation efficacy of the gabion walls is derived based on the findings of this study. The findings from this study can serve as a reference for the use of gabion walls in the development of practical building designs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据