4.7 Article

Algebraic Differential Evolution Algorithm for the Permutation Flowshop Scheduling Problem With Total Flowtime Criterion

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TEVC.2015.2507785

关键词

Algebraic differential mutation; differential evolution (DE); permutation flowshop scheduling; permutations space

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research under PRIN through University of Perugia [2010FP79LR_003]
  2. Dipartimento di Matematica e Informatica Project Mobile Knowledge Agents in Evolutionary Environments

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces an original algebraic approach to differential evolution (DE) algorithms for combinatorial search spaces. An abstract algebraic differential mutation for generic combinatorial spaces is defined by exploiting the concept of a finitely generated group. This operator is specialized for the permutations space by means of an original randomized bubble sort algorithm. Then, a discrete DE algorithm is derived for permutation problems and it is applied to the permutation flow-shop scheduling problem with the total flowtime criterion. Other relevant components of the proposed algorithm are: a crossover operator for permutations, a novel biased selection strategy, a heuristic-based initialization, and a memetic restart procedure. Extensive experimental tests have been performed on a widely accepted benchmark suite in order to analyze the dynamics of the proposed approach and to compare it with the state-of-theart algorithms. The experimental results clearly show that the proposed algorithm reaches state-of-the-art performances and, most remarkably, it is able to find some new best known results. Furthermore, the experimental analysis on the impact of the algorithmic components shows that the two main contributions of this paper, i.e., the discrete differential mutation and the biased selection operator, greatly contribute to the overall performance of the algorithm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据