4.7 Article

Exergetic, exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses of a hybrid combined locomotive powering system for rail transportation

期刊

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
卷 245, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114619

关键词

Rail Transportation; Fuel cells; Alternative fuels; Exergy; Exergoeconomic analysis; Exergoenvironmental analysis; Hydrogen

资金

  1. Transport Canada through its Clean Transportation Program-Research and Development
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents exergetic, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental analyses of a new hybrid locomotive powering system using five alternative fuels to achieve high efficiency and reduce environmental impact. A fuel blend of 75% pure natural gas and 25% hydrogen is found to be the most cost effective and environmentally friendly option.
Alternative and clean powering options are recognized as a crucial step in making rail transportation environmentally-benign, efficient and sustainable. This paper presents the exergetic, exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses of a new hybrid locomotive powering system, consisting of an internal combustion engine, molten carbonate fuel cell, gas turbine, and absorption refrigeration system. Five alternative fuels are selected and considered with different concentrations, such as natural gas, methanol, ethanol, dimethyl ether, and hydrogen. The entire system achieves a high exergetic efficiency of 83% with a total exergy destruction of 17 MW. The system components have a total levelized capital cost of 32.15 $/h and component-related environmental impact of 86 mPt/h. The entire system has a specific exergy cost and specific environmental impact of 0.10$/GJ and 69.4 mPt/MJ, respectively. It has the total exergoeconomic and environmental impact factors of 3.7% and 0.015%, and the relative cost and environmental impact differences of 21.9% and 19.4%, respectively. The fuel blend of 75% pure natural gas and 25% hydrogen is found to be the most cost effective option with the least environmental impact, compared to other alternative fuel blends.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据