4.7 Article

Chemical Looping Combustion of Coal Chars Using Iron Ore of Different Grades as Oxygen Carriers

期刊

ENERGY & FUELS
卷 35, 期 20, 页码 16494-16505

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c02000

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52025063]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that different grades of iron ore exhibit diverse oxygen-carrying capacity in chemical looping combustion; the gasification rate of coal char plays a crucial role in the adaptability to oxygen carriers; iron ore with Fe2O3 content in the range 70-80 wt % shows the best adaptability towards the conversion of coal char with different ranks.
Natural ore, which is cost-effective and reserve-abundant, is more attractive to be used as oxygen carriers (OCs) in industrial-scale chemical looping combustion (CLC) units compared to synthetic OCs. In this paper, five kinds of iron ore of different grades (with Fe2O3 contents at around 50, 60, 70, 80, and 90 wt %) are investigated as OCs in a batch fluidized bed reactor by using three kinds of coal char with different ranks as fuels. The aim is to illustrate the matching relationship between coal rank and iron ore grade in CLC applications. The experimental results indicate that five different hematite OCs exhibit diverse reaction performance in CLC of coal char. Generally, the carbon conversion rate is accelerated with the increase of iron ore grades. In contrast, the enhancement for high-grade iron ore is not apparent due to the limited coal char gasification rate in the reaction. For the low-rank coal char, it shows high adaptability to different grades of iron ore. However, the adaptability of the high-rank coal char is relatively poor on account of its slow char gasification rate. Overall, iron ore with Fe2O3 content in the range 70-80 wt % shows sufficient oxygen-carrying capacity in CLC and exhibits the best adaptability toward the conversion of coal char with different ranks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据