4.7 Article

A new intuitionistic fuzzy combinative distance-based assessment framework to assess low-carbon sustainable suppliers in the maritime sector

期刊

ENERGY
卷 237, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121500

关键词

Low carbon sustainable supplier; Sustainable supply chain management; Intuitionistic fuzzy sets; Discrimination measure; CODAS

资金

  1. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Selecting low-carbon suppliers is crucial for promoting sustainable supplier chain management. This study introduces a new fuzzy decision-making approach to evaluate and rank low-carbon, sustainable suppliers, resulting in a new method called intuitionistic fuzzy CODAS. Through a case study and sensitivity analysis, the viability and effectiveness of the developed approach were validated.
Evaluating and selecting suitable low-carbon suppliers is one of the most disputed topics in different industries. Some studies have more specifically investigated the role of sustainable low-carbon suppliers in the maritime sector. In general, sustainability is recognized as a vital philosophy for many industrial sectors since it enhances environmental protection and raises people's and organizations' awareness about social obligations. Therefore, choosing low-carbon suppliers based on the sustainability perspective is important for firms and organizations in order to effectively promote sustainable supplier chain management (SSCM). The present study develops a new fuzzy decision-making approach to rank and evaluate low-carbon, sustainable suppliers (LCSS) through the integration of the Combinative Distance Based Assessment (CODAS) framework and intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs), which results in a new approach called intuitionistic fuzzy CODAS (IF-CODAS). The paper is aimed at making a decision on the IFSs context by considering the decision makers' hesitancy based on both Hamming and Euclidean distances in accordance with the anti-ideal point. To evaluate the weights of the criteria, a new discrimination measure is developed. To show the practicality of the proposed approach, a case study for the assessment of low carbon sustainable suppliers is presented. To validate the developed approach, comparative research and sensitivity analysis were conducted in this study. The evaluation results showed that the fourth low-carbon sustainable supplier with a maximum assessment score degree (0.4747) using the proposed method was found the best option for selecting LCSS based on the sustainability perspective. Furthermore, the sensitivity analysis was made to observe the difference of alternative ranking when the importance values of criteria weights change. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据