4.7 Article

Economic optimization for process transition based on redundant control variables in the framework of zone model predictive control

期刊

ENERGY
卷 241, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122942

关键词

Economic optimization; Dynamic optimization; Model predictive control; Zone control; Switching control

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foun-dation of China [21676295]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes an optimization strategy based on redundant control variables under the zone control framework to improve economic optimization effect. By designing two different optimization strategies to avoid controller switching at the boundary of the zone control target, the study achieved greater economic benefits compared to previous research.
This paper proposes an optimization strategy based on redundant control variables under the zone control framework and can improve the economic optimization effect. First, we briefly reviewed the general concepts of redundant control and zone control. Then we analyzed the limitations of this opti-mization strategy, the reason is the impact of the change of redundant control variables on the system state variables. This will cause the switching of the controller on the boundary of the zone control target, which will affect the economic benefits of the system. Based on the above problems, we have designed two different optimization strategies to avoid this switching action. The first method is to temporarily disable the switching conditions during the process transition to avoid triggering the switching action. The second method is to dynamically change the rate of change of redundant control variables so that the system can not trigger the switching conditions. Finally, we verified the feasibility of the two improved optimization strategies we proposed through numerical simulation, and achieved greater economic benefits compared with previous studies. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据