4.7 Article

The evolution of renewable energy and its impact on carbon reduction in China

期刊

ENERGY
卷 237, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121639

关键词

Renewable energy; Carbon emissions; Quantile regression

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71934001]
  2. Beijing Institute of Technology Research Fund Program for Young Scholars

向作者/读者索取更多资源

China is under unprecedented pressure to control its carbon emissions, but the development of renewable energy can effectively reduce carbon emission intensity. Different levels of renewable energy development have inhibitory effects on carbon emissions, with a smaller direct impact but a larger indirect impact on carbon emissions.
China is facing unprecedented pressure to control its carbon emissions as it is the biggest emitter across the world. The Chinese central government has shown its ambition to reduce carbon emissions by proposing to change the current energy structure by encouraging the use of renewable energy. To identify how this development can help China improve its emissions reductions, we measure the influence of renewable energy generation in China on its carbon emissions through a quantile regression model and path analysis of inter-provincial panel data from 2008 to 2017. The results indicate that, first, renewable energy development has an inhibitory influence on carbon emission intensity; for every 1% increase in renewable energy development, carbon emission intensity decreases in the range of 0.028%-0.043%. Second, based on the results of the quantile regression, the development of renewable energy at different levels has an inhibitory effect on carbon emissions. Third, the development of renewable energy has a less direct effect on carbon emissions, although its indirect effect is relatively large; specifically, two indicators, energy intensity and GDP per capita, have an inhibitory influence on carbon emissions. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据