4.7 Article

Study on CO2 foam fracturing model and fracture propagation simulation

期刊

ENERGY
卷 238, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121778

关键词

CO2 foam; Fracture; Multi field coupling; Displacement discontinuity method

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52174024]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a CO2 foam fracturing fracture propagation model with temperature-pressure-phase coupling is established. The results show that improving the CO2 foam quality can significantly enhance the fracturing effect, and the fracture propagation is significantly affected by injection temperature.
CO2 foam fracturing fluid has the advantages of water saving and environmental protection, which has been widely used in unconventional oil and gas reservoir. However, there are still many technical difficulties in fracture propagation model and numerical calculation method of CO2 foam fracturing. In this paper, a CO2 foam fracturing fracture propagation model with temperature-pressure-phase coupling is established. Physical parameters of CO2 are calculated by Span-Wagner method, and the finite difference and displacement discontinuity methods are used to solve the model. Moreover, we compare the results of this model with the field measured data, KGD model and EFRAC-3D model to verify the model. The computation results show that in the process of fracturing, improving the CO2 foam quality can significantly enhance the fracturing effect. When the quality increased from 0.5 to 0.8, the fracture width raised by more than 2 times. In addition, the fracture propagation is significantly affected by injection temperature. With the increase of injection temperature, fracture width decreases continuously, and if the CO2 foam is supercritical phase state, it is not conducive to increase the fracture width. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据