4.7 Article

Kinetic parameters of petroleum coke gasification for modelling chemical-looping combustion systems

期刊

ENERGY
卷 232, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.120935

关键词

Petroleum coke; Gasification; Chemical-looping combustion

资金

  1. European Union [764697]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China by Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) [2017YFE0112500]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The process of petcoke conversion in chemical looping combustion technology requires detailed knowledge about the reactions with O-2, CO2, and H2O. Experimental results showed that the reaction with CO2 was slow, and kinetic parameters of petcoke gasification were determined by applying different models to the data obtained from a custom test rig.
One of the best low-cost approaches for capturing carbon dioxide from the combustion of solid fuels is chemical looping combustion (CLC) technology, where the processes of fuel oxidation and extraction of oxygen from the air are split in two separate reactors. In order to model the petroleum coke (petcoke) conversion in a CLC method, detailed knowledge about the reactions of pet-coke with O-2, CO2, and H2O at temperatures between 750 and 1100 degrees C is required. Due to the lack of sufficient literature data, in this paper, the reactivity of these reactions is investigated in a custom-built test rig that enabled measurements of the mass loss of the fuel sample and the composition of the released gases. The Avrami, Random Pore, Shrinking Core, and Hybrid models were applied to the experimental results to determine the kinetic parameters of petcoke gasification. At temperatures up to 1000 degrees C, the reaction with CO2 was found to be negligibly slow. An activation energy of 103.91 kJ/mol was obtained for petcoke gasification in 10-40 vol% of H2O, while a value of 15.87 kJ/mol was found for oxidation in 2-4 vol% O-2, as described by best-fitting models, i.e. Hybrid and Random Pore models, respectively. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据