4.7 Article

A multi-criterion decision analysis framework for sustainable energy retrofit in buildings

期刊

ENERGY
卷 239, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122315

关键词

Analytical hierarchy process; Life cycle assessment; Net-zero energy building; Sustainability; VIKOR

资金

  1. De La Salle University-Manila
  2. University of the Philippines-Diliman

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Old buildings often have poor energy performance but new buildings are focusing on sustainable design and energy improvement. A systematic decision framework is developed to evaluate energy retrofit strategies and identify a compromise solution, which considers all stakeholders involved. Stakeholders preferred retrofit scenarios with on-site generation, mechanical/electrical improvements, and building envelope improvements.
Old buildings are known to have poor energy performance and have limited improvement options as they approach their end-of-life. The demand for sustainable design and construction of new buildings and the desire to improve the performance of existing ones is rapidly increasing. Given numerous retrofit options available, it is imperative to determine which criteria should be used to arrive at a logical and impartial choice. Multifarious and conflicting factors such as environmental, economic, social, and technical performance further complicate the decision-making process. To address this, a systematic hybrid decision framework is developed to evaluate energy retrofit strategies and to identify a compromise retrofit scenario which considers all stakeholders involved. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is used to determine the relative weight of each criterion based on stakeholders' judgement while VIKOR is used to arrive at a compromise retrofit solution using relevant performance metrics. Although a Net-Zero Energy (NZE) scenario was proven technically feasible, this scenario was not identified as a compromise solution. Instead, three retrofit scenarios on-site generation with high energy potential, mechanical/electrical with moderate energy potential, and building envelope with low energy potential showed good compromise for stakeholders. The proposed framework can be used as a tool by decision makers to arrive at compromise solutions that can benefit stakeholders. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据