4.7 Article

Metal-organic framework derived zirconium oxide/carbon composite as an improved supercapacitor electrode

期刊

ENERGY
卷 235, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121351

关键词

UiO-66; ZrO2; C composite; Solid-state supercapacitor; Power density; Specific capacitance

资金

  1. University Grant Commission, India
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science and ITC (MSIT) of Korean government [2021R1A3B1068304]
  3. CSIR, India [MLP-2006, MLP-0029]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The pyrolysis of MOFs is an effective method for synthesizing nanoporous structures for energy storage applications. The ZrO2/C nanocomposite derived from UiO-66 shows superior electrochemical performance in supercapacitor applications without requiring external conductive agents, delivering high energy density and capacitance retention after multiple charge/discharge cycles.
The pyrolysis of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) is an effective strategy for the synthesis of novel nanoporous structures for energy storage applications. In this work, the preparation of a zirconium oxide/carbon (ZrO2/C) nanocomposite via the pyrolysis of UiO-6 6 (a zirconium-based MOF) is reported for the first time. These MOF-derived metal oxide/carbon (ZrO2/C) materials have a great advantage in the case of supercapacitor applications over other MOFs or their derivatives as they do not need any external conductive agent. The ZrO2/C electrode exhibits an excellent electrochemical performance, delivering a specific capacitance of 241.5 F/g at 1 A/g current density. A 2 V symmetrical supercapacitor device is also prepared by employing a solid-state polymer gel electrolyte. The assembled device of ZrO2/ C electrode has delivered a high energy density of around 29 Wh/kg (at a high power density of 1.5 kW/ kg) while retaining almost 97% of the specific capacitance even after 2000 continuous charge/discharge cycles. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据