4.7 Article

Catalyzed pyrolysis of coffee and tea wastes

期刊

ENERGY
卷 235, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121252

关键词

Renewable energy; Waste management; Coffee grounds; Tea grounds; Pyrolysis; Catalysts

资金

  1. IDMEC, project FCT, Portugal [UIDP/50022/2020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The pyrolysis of food waste has the environmental advantage of waste management and renewable fuel production. Tea grounds have higher cellulose content and activation energy for pyrolysis compared to coffee grounds, leading to lower liquid product yield. The use of alkaline carbonates as catalysts increases bio-gas production, decreases bio-oil production, and enhances the volatile fraction of bio-oils.
The pyrolysis of food waste has a double environmental advantage as it contributes to the management and treatment of waste and allows the production of renewable fuels. Spent coffee and tea grounds, were characterized by thermogravimetry to determine their composition and evaluating the pyrolysis kinetics of each lignocellulosic pseudocomponent and pyrolyzed in a fixed bed reactor. Tea grounds had about twice the cellulose and higher pyrolysis activation energy than the coffee grounds sample. At 673 K the pyrolysis of the coffee grounds led to a 42% bio-oil yield while the tea grounds produced only 18% of liquid product, which is compatible with its higher cellulose content and the higher activation energy for pyrolysis. The alkaline carbonates used as pyrolysis catalysts led to an increase in the production of a gaseous product, bio-gas, with a reduction in the production of bio-oil but accompanied by a significant increase in the volatile fraction of the produced bio-oils. Pyrolysis data shows that both coffee and tea residues can be used as raw materials to produce pyrolysis bio-oil and that low-value materials such as alkaline carbonates can be used as pyrolysis catalysts improving the characteristics of bio-oils produced such as acidity and volatility. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据