4.7 Article

Morphology of char particles from coal pyrolysis in a pressurized entrained flow reactor: Effects of pressure and atmosphere

期刊

ENERGY
卷 238, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121846

关键词

Pressurized pyrolysis; Pressurized drop tube furnace; Char morphology; Swelling behavior

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51761125012, 51676157]
  2. Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China [2021JC-03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the pyrolysis behavior of coal at elevated pressure using a pressurized drop tube furnace, revealing that pressure, atmosphere, and coal rank significantly affect volatile releasing and char evolution.
A pressurized drop tube furnace was used to study the pyrolysis behavior of bituminous and lignite coal at elevated pressure. Experiments were conducted at the pressure range from 1 to 10 atm in 100% N-2 or 100% CO2 atmosphere. The volatile yields, char morphology, swelling ratio, and pore structure were discussed in detail. The results show that the pressure, atmosphere and coal rank could effect on the volatile releasing and char evolution significantly. In N-2 atmosphere, the total volatile yields of YL and NM coal decrease as the pressure elevated, while in CO2 atmosphere, the mass release of NM coal increases at high pressure contributed by the reaction of CO2 with organic macromolecule inside the particles; different with bituminous coal, no significant swelling behavior is found with the increase of pressure; the BET surface area of YL char decreases as the pressure increases, while for lignite coal, in N-2 atmosphere and at high pressure, less macro pores are formed, which could contribute to the BET surface area. While in CO2 atmosphere, the CO2-macromocular organic reaction would promote the volatile releasing, and the BET surface area decreases significantly at high pressure. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据