4.5 Article

Research on Constant Voltage/Current Output of LCC-S Envelope Modulation Wireless Power Transfer System

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en15041562

关键词

wireless power transfer (WPT); constant current (CC); constant voltage (CV); inductor-capacitor-capacitor; series (LCC-S); envelope modulation wireless power transfer (EM-WPT); AC-AC boost converter

资金

  1. Science and Technology Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission [KJQN201801142, KJQN202001144]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aims to design a reliable and efficient WPT system with constant current and constant voltage output for AC loads. A new EM-WPT system is proposed with detailed control strategy, achieving high efficiency and power factor.
As a technology that makes power transfer more flexible, wireless power transfer (WPT) technology has become a hot research topic in recent years. However, most of the existing studies are based on a DC-DC WPT system. If applied to AC loads, the traditional system usually contains multiple energy conversion stages, which lead to a low transmission efficiency and therefore higher costs. Besides, the necessary large electrolytic capacitors make the system unreliable and bulky. The goal of this study is to design a reliable and efficient WPT system featuring constant current (CC) and constant voltage (CV) output for AC loads. In this work, an inductor-capacitor-capacitor series (LCC-S) enveloped modulation wireless power transfer (EM-WPT) system is proposed. The design of the proposed system is elaborated in this paper, including the working principle of the system's power converters, the relationship between CC/CV output characteristics and the input current, and the control strategy of CC/CV output based on an AC-AC boost converter. Lastly, an experimental prototype is configured to verify the CC/CV characteristics. The measured overall efficiency of the system reaches 91% and the power factor of input power supply approaches 1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据