4.5 Article

A Hybrid Optimization Algorithm for Solving of the Unit Commitment Problem Considering Uncertainty of the Load Demand

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 14, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en14238014

关键词

unit commitment; optimization; equilibrium optimizer; particle swarm optimization; uncertainty

资金

  1. Taif University Researchers Supporting Project [TURSP-2020/146]
  2. Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper proposes a hybrid optimization technique, MPSO-EO, to solve the unit commitment problem (UCP) under deterministic and stochastic load demand, which outperforms standard EO with significant cost savings. The simulation results demonstrate the fairly good performance of MPSO-EO in solving UCP compared to standard EO and other reported techniques.
Unit commitment problem (UCP) is classified as a mixed-integer, large combinatorial, high-dimensional and nonlinear optimization problem. This paper suggests solving the UCP under deterministic and stochastic load demand using a hybrid technique that includes the modified particle swarm optimization (MPSO) along with equilibrium optimizer (EO), termed as MPSO-EO. The proposed approach is tested firstly on 15 benchmark test functions, and then it is implemented to solve the UCP under two test systems. The results are basically compared to that of standard EO and previously applied optimization techniques in solving the UCP. In test system 1, the load demand is deterministic. The proposed technique is in the best three solutions for the 10-unit system with cost savings of 309.95 USD over standard EO and for the 20-unit system it shows the best results over all algorithms in comparison with cost savings of 1951.5 USD over standard EO. In test system 2, the load demand is considered stochastic, and only the 10-unit system is studied. The proposed technique outperforms the standard EO with cost savings of 40.93 USD. The simulation results demonstrate that MPSO-EO has fairly good performance for solving the UCP with significant total operating cost savings compared to standard EO compared with other reported techniques.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据