4.5 Article

On the Impact of Climate Change on Building Energy Consumptions: A Meta-Analysis

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en15010354

关键词

climate change; energy consumption; impact assessments; building performance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The literature on climate change impacts on building energy consumption is increasing. Global warming leads to a decrease in heating consumption, an increase in cooling consumption, and a growth in total consumption. However, the wide range of expected changes requires further studies to identify appropriate adaptation strategies.
The body of literature on climate change impacts on building energy consumption is rising, driven by the urgency to implement adaptation measures. Nevertheless, the multitude of prediction methodologies, future scenarios, as well as climate zones investigated, results in a wide range of expected changes. For these reasons, the present review aims to map climate change impacts on building energy consumption from a quantitative perspective and to identify potential relationships between energy variation and a series of variables that could affect them, including heating and cooling degree-days (HDDs and CDDs), reference period, future time slices and IPCC emission scenarios, by means of statistical techniques. In addition, an overview of the main characteristics of the studies related to locations investigated, building types and methodological approaches are given. To sum up, global warming leads to: (i) decrease in heating consumptions; (ii) increase in cooling consumption; (iii) growth in total consumptions, with notable differences between climate zones. No strong correlation between the parameters was found, although a moderate linear correlation was identified between heating variation and HDDs, and total variation and HDDs. The great variability of the collected data demonstrates the importance of increasing specific impact studies, required to identify appropriate adaptation strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据