4.5 Article

Key Factors Influencing the Achievement of Climate Neutrality Targets in the Manufacturing Industry: LMDI Decomposition Analysis

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 14, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en14238006

关键词

decomposition analysis; LMDI; CO2 emissions; manufacturing industry; energy policy; sustainability

资金

  1. Ministry of Economics of the Republic of Latvia, project The pathway to energy efficient future for Latvia (EnergyPath) [VPP-EM-EE-2018/1-0006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The manufacturing industry has made significant progress in improving energy efficiency and reducing carbon emissions, but the increase in industrial activity in recent years has partially offset these improvements. Therefore, additional policies are needed to accelerate the deployment of clean energy and energy efficiency technologies in the future.
The manufacturing industry is often caught in the sustainability dilemma between economic growth targets and climate action plans. In this study, a Log-Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) decomposition analysis is applied to investigate how the amount of industrial energy-related CO2 emissions in Latvia has changed in the period from 1995 to 2019. The change in aggregate energy-related CO2 emissions in manufacturing industries is measured by five different factors: the industrial activity effect, structural change effect, energy intensity effect, fuel mix effect, and emission intensity effect. The decomposition analysis results showed that while there has been significant improvement in energy efficiency and decarbonization measures in industry, in recent years, the impact of the improvements has been largely offset by increased industrial activity in energy-intensive sectors such as wood processing and non-metallic mineral production. The results show that energy efficiency measures in industry contribute most to reducing carbon emissions. In the future, additional policies are needed to accelerate the deployment of clean energy and energy efficiency technologies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据