4.5 Article

Design and Operation of a Polygeneration System in Spanish Climate Buildings under an Exergetic Perspective

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 14, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en14227636

关键词

exergy in office buildings; exergy polygeneration indicators; AHU exergy analysis

资金

  1. Laboratory for the Quality Control in Buildings of the Basque Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study defines and analyzes the performance of a polygeneration system in different locations in Spain to maintain the thermal comfort and air quality of an office building. The system in Bilbao is self-sufficient in summer, with no need to import electricity from the grid. By calculating polygeneration indicators, energy savings related to a separated production facility can be quantified.
This work defines and analyzes the performance of a polygeneration system in five different locations in Spain to maintain the thermal comfort and air quality of an office building. The facility is based on a chiller and a CHP engine with PV panels that provide almost all the electricity demand of the chiller. According to the energy performance analysis results, the installation working in Bilbao is a full polygeneration system since no electricity needs to be imported from the grid in summer. To quantify the energy savings related to a separated production facility, polygeneration indicators (percentage of savings PES/PExS and equivalent electric efficiency EEE/EExE) have been calculated in energy and exergy terms. The main motivation for using exergy is based on the ambiguity that can arise from the point of view of the First Law. As expected, the exergetic indicators have lower values than the energetic ones. In addition, an in-depth analysis was conducted for the air-handling unit components. The study shows the behavior of components over the year and the efficiency values from both an energy and exergy point of view. From these facts, the need arises to develop methodologies based on exergy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据