4.5 Article

Low Power Modular Battery Management System with a Wireless Communication Interface

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 14, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en14196320

关键词

lithium-ion batteries; energy efficiency; modular battery management systems; wireless communication protocols; low power electronics

资金

  1. National Centre for Research and Development of Poland [POIR.01.02.00-00-0297/17-00]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper discusses the design and development of large electric energy storage systems made of lithium cells, proposing an alternative approach for the design and analysis of large modular battery management systems. It presents algorithms for assembly, reporting, management, and communication procedures as robust design tools for further development of large and scalable battery systems. The analysis shows comparable energy usage for the developed battery management system and the energy dissipated due to self-discharge of lithium-ion cells.
The paper concerns the design and development of large electric energy storage systems made of lithium cells. Most research advances in the development of lithium-ion battery management systems focus solely on safety, functionality, and improvement of the procedures for assessing the performance of systems without considering their energy efficiency. The paper presents an alternative approach to the design and analysis of large modular battery management systems. A modular battery management system and the dedicated wireless communication system were designed to analyze and optimize energy consumption. The algorithms for assembly, reporting, management, and communication procedures described in the paper are a robust design tool for further developing large and scalable battery systems. The conducted analysis of energy efficiency for the exemplary 100S15P system shows that the energy used to power the developed battery management system is comparable to the energy dissipated due to the intrinsic self-discharge of lithium-ion cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据