4.5 Article

An Improved Virtual Inertia Control Strategy for Low Voltage AC Microgrids with Hybrid Energy Storage Systems

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 15, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en15020442

关键词

virtual inertia control; microgrid; hybrid energy storage system; feedforward control

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51767019, 51867020]
  2. Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Scientific Research Plan Project [201802030]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a novel virtual inertia control method, based on a feedforward decoupling strategy, to address the low inertia issue of power-converter-interfaced microgrids. The proposed method eliminates the coupling between active and reactive power and increases the inertia of the microgrid using a virtual inertia control method for the supercapacitor converter.
This paper proposes a novel virtual inertia control (VIC) method based on a feedforward decoupling strategy to address the low inertia issue of power-converter-interfaced microgrids. The feedforward control scheme is employed to eliminate the coupling between active and reactive power caused by line impedance. The active power-voltage droop can be applied to the battery converter in the hybrid energy storage system (HESS). A novel VIC method is developed for the supercapacitor (SC) converter of HESS to increase the inertia of the microgrid. Detailed small-signal modeling of the SC converter with the proposed VIC was conducted, and the transfer function model was obtained. Parameter analysis of the virtual inertia and virtual damping was carried out with the pole-zero map method, and the step response characteristic of output voltage amplitude with power variation was analyzed in detail, deriving the parameter design principle. The simulation study verifies the effectiveness and validity of the proposed control strategy. The proposed feedforward decoupling method and VIC can be widely applied in microgrids to enhance inertia and improve their power quality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据