4.5 Article

Increasing the Biogas Potential of Rapeseed Straw Using Pulsed Electric Field Pre-Treatment

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 14, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en14248307

关键词

pulsed electric field; anaerobic digestion; methane fermentation; biogas production; lignocellulose; rapeseed straw

资金

  1. National Centre for Research and Development as part of the LIDER IX programme
  2. National Centre for Research and Development
  3. [LIDER/8/0026/L-9/17/NCBR/2018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The utilization of lignocellulosic biomass for energy production via methane fermentation is economically and environmentally justified, although its low conversion factor requires the development of new pre-treatment methods. Using a pulsed electric field (PEF) to disintegrate rapeseed straw prior to methane fermentation significantly increased biogas productivity, with the best results achieved after a 5-minute PEF pre-treatment.
Due to the high availability of lignocellulosic biomass, which can be obtained from terrestrial plants, agricultural waste biomass, and the agro-food, paper or wood industries, its use for energy production by methane fermentation is economically and environmentally justified. However, due to their complex structures, lignocellulosic substrates have a low conversion factor to biogas. Therefore, scientists are still working on the development of new methods of the pre-treatment of lignocellulosic materials that will increase the biogas productivity from lignocellulosic biomass. The presented research focuses on the use of a pulsed electric field (PEF) to disintegrate rapeseed straw prior to the methane fermentation process. Scanning electron microscopy observation showed that, in the disintegrated sample, the extent of damage to the plant tissue was more severe than in the control sample. In the sample disintegrated for 7 min, the chemical oxygen demand increased from 4146 +/- 75 mg/L to 4920 +/- 60 mg/L. The best result was achieved with a 5-min PEF pre-treatment. The methane production reached 290.8 +/- 12.1 NmL CH4/g VS, and the biogas production was 478.0 +/- 27.5 NmL/g VS; it was 14% and 15% higher, respectively, compared to the control sample.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据