4.5 Article

Basal Insulin Degludec and Glycemic Control Compared to Aspart Via Insulin Pump in Type 1 Diabetes (BIGLEAP): A Single-Center, Open-Label, Randomized, Crossover Trial

期刊

ENDOCRINE PRACTICE
卷 28, 期 2, 页码 165-172

出版社

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.eprac.2021.11.001

关键词

type 1 diabetes; insulin degludec; glycemic control; hypoglycemia; insulin pump therapy; continuous glucose monitoring

资金

  1. Novo Nordisk, Baegsvard, Denmark

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study compared the efficacy of second-generation basal insulin degludec (IDeg) to insulin aspart via pump in patients with well-controlled type 1 diabetes, using continuous glucose monitoring. The results showed similar glycemic control, hypoglycemic rates, blood glucose stability, and hemoglobin A1C levels between IDeg and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII).
Objective: We compared the efficacy of the second-generation basal insulin degludec (IDeg) to that of insulin aspart via pump using continuous glucose monitoring in patients with well-controlled type 1 diabetes. Methods: In this 40-week, single-center, randomized, crossover-controlled trial, adults with wellcontrolled type 1 diabetes (hemoglobin A1C of <7.5% [<58 mmol/mol]) (N = 52) who were using an insulin pump and continuous glucose monitoring were randomized to 1 of 2 treatments for a 20-week period: a single daily injection of IDeg with bolus aspart via pump or a continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) with aspart, followed by crossover to the other treatment. The primary endpoint was time in range (70-180 mg/dL) during the final 2 weeks of each treatment period. Results: Fifty-two patients were randomized and completed both treatment periods. The time in range for IDeg and CSII was 71.5% and 70.9%, respectively (P = .553). The time in level 1 hypoglycemia for the 24-hour period with IDeg and CSII was 2.19% and 1.75%, respectively (P = .065). The time in level 2 hypoglycemia for the 24-hour period with IDeg and CSII was 0.355% and 0.271%, respectively (P = .212), and the nocturnal period was 0.330% and 0.381%, respectively (P = .639). The mean standard deviation of blood glucose levels for the 24-hour period for IDeg and CSII was 52.4 mg/dL and 51.0 mg/dL, respectively (P = .294). The final hemoglobin A1C level for each treatment was 7.04% (53 mmol/mol) with IDeg, and 6.95% (52 mmol/mol) with CSII (P = .288). Adverse events were similar between treatments. Conclusion: We observed similar glycemic control between IDeg and insulin aspart via CSII for basal insulin coverage in patients with well-controlled type 1 diabetes. (c) 2021 AACE. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据