4.6 Article

A low vanadium permeability sulfonated polybenzimidazole membrane with a metal-organic framework for vanadium redox flow batteries

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 405, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.139795

关键词

Metal-organic framework; Vanadium redox flow battery; Low vanadium transmittance; Sulfonated polybenzimidazole

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology of Jilin Province [20180101209JC]
  2. Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Supramolecular Structure and Materials [sklssm2021022]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of China [22075031]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a proton selective membrane based on a metal-organic framework (MOF) and polybenzimidazole (PBI) was designed for vanadium redox flow battery (VRFB) applications. The membrane exhibited a high vanadium resistance rate and low vanadium transmittance, resulting in improved voltage efficiency and energy efficiency for VRFB.
A proton selective membrane based on a metal-organic framework (MOF) and polybenzimidazole (PBI) with a controllable sulfonation degree is designed for vanadium redox flow battery (VRFB) applications. The size of UiO-66 is between hydrated multivalent vanadium ions and stokes radius of protons, and its suitable pore size can obstruct the penetration of vanadium ions, resulting in a high vanadium resistance rate. Simultaneously, the imidazole groups and sulfonic acid groups in the sulfonated polybenzimidazole compose the acid-base pairs, which block the penetration of vanadium ions. Therefore, sulfonated PBI together with UiO-66 forms a denser network structure for as a vanadium ion barrier. Compare with the Nafion117 film, the vanadium transmittance of prepared composite film is lower (5.15 x 10(-7) cm(2) min(-1) vs. 2.95 x 10(-9) cm(2) min(-1)). Compare with the Nafion117 membrane, VRFB with MOF polymer exhibits higher voltage efficiency (94.54%-74.93%) and energy efficiency (84.82%-73.98%) at 40-200 mA & BULL;cm(-2). (c) 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据