4.6 Article

Ag-MOF-derived 3D Ag dendrites used for the efficient electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 to CO

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 403, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.139652

关键词

Electrocatalysis; CO2 reduction; Dendritic Ag; MOFs derivation; CO formation

资金

  1. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LZ18B070001, LQ21E080011]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2021M693414]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22076168, 5200158, 22006131, 21908199, 51978654, 21876156]
  4. Zhejiang Provincial Ten Thousand Talent Program [2018R52013]
  5. Central Government Guided Local Science and Technology Development Fund [2021ZY1022]
  6. [520 0 0158]
  7. [220 06131]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An intrinsic versatile Ag electrode derived in situ from Ag-MOF on Ag foam exhibits remarkable performance in eCO(2)RR to form CO, with 3D dendrite structure promoting mass diffusion, rich edges sites favoring CO2 adsorption and conversion, and highly exposed facet facilitating the desorption of CO.
Ag-based electrodes have emerged as important candidates for the industrial electrochemical CO2 reduction reaction (eCO(2)RR) to form CO. Herein, an intrinsic versatile Ag electrode has been derived in situ from Ag-MOF on Ag foam (denoted as ER-AF), which exhibits the highest current density (57.2 mA cm(-2)) at a potential of -1.15 V vs. RHE reported to date for the formation of CO in a commonly used H-type cell. ER-AF has multiple-roles: The 3D dendrite structure promotes mass diffusion; the rich edges sites favor CO2 adsorption and conversion, and the highly exposed (111) facet facilitates the desorption of CO. Their cooperating functions result in the remarkable performance of ER-AF in the eCO(2)RR to form CO. This work offers an effective strategy to achieve high eCO(2)RR activity and selectivity by assembling the active and stable sites together on the MOF-derived materials. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据