4.6 Article

The impacts of convex piecewise linear cost formulations on AC optimal power flow

期刊

ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH
卷 199, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2021.107191

关键词

Nonlinear optimization; Convex optimization; Optimal power flow; Piecewise linear functions

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-e)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research has shown that nonlinear optimization methods are highly sensitive to the mathematical formulation of piecewise linear functions, with a poor choice of formulation potentially slowing down algorithm performance by a factor of ten.
Despite strong connections through shared application areas, research efforts on power market optimization (e. g., unit commitment) and power network optimization (e.g., optimal power flow) remain largely independent. A notable illustration of this is the treatment of power generation cost functions, where nonlinear network optimization has largely used polynomial representations and market optimization has adopted piecewise linear encodings. This work combines state-of-the-art results from both lines of research to understand the best mathematical formulations of the nonlinear AC optimal power flow problem with piecewise linear generation cost functions. An extensive numerical analysis of non-convex models, linear approximations, and convex relaxations across fifty-four realistic test cases illustrates that nonlinear optimization methods are surprisingly sensitive to the mathematical formulation of piecewise linear functions. The results indicate that a poor formulation choice can slow down algorithm performance by a factor of ten, increasing the runtime from seconds to minutes. These results provide valuable insights into the best formulations of nonlinear optimal power flow problems with piecewise linear cost functions, an important step towards building a new generation of energy markets that incorporate the nonlinear AC power flow model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据