4.3 Article

Nutritional ecology of martens (Martes foina and Martes martes) in the western Italian Alps

期刊

ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH
卷 37, 期 1, 页码 127-136

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1440-1703.12277

关键词

allopatry; competition; diet; macronutrient ratio; sympatry

类别

资金

  1. Val Grande National Park

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The macronutrient requirements of the closely related pine marten and stone marten are almost identical, but in overlapping European ranges, the stone marten tends to be more frugivorous, leading to a higher contribution of carbohydrate energy. The dominance of the pine marten in interspecific interactions is supported by the unaffected macronutrient intake in the presence of the stone marten.
The macronutrient requirements of the strictly related pine marten (Martes martes) and stone marten (Martes foina) are almost identical, but, at range scale, in areas of putative sympatry (overlapping European ranges) the stone marten tends to be more frugivorous, which makes the contribution of carbohydrate energy to be higher than the target. In contrast, the macronutrient intake of the pine marten would be unaffected by the occurrence of the stone marten, supporting the putative dominance of the first in interspecific interactions. Most available studies examined marten diets separately, highlighting the need for further studies in areas of actual co-occurrence. With this aim, we compared the two martens' diets in the Italian Alps both in sympatric and allopatric conditions, as assessed by the genetic identification of scats. Although fruit and rodents formed the bulk of both species' diets, as predicted the stone marten consumed twice as many fruit species as the pine marten and ate fruit more often in areas of sympatry, thus consuming less protein and more carbohydrates respect to its intake target. This competition-driven, nutritionally imbalanced diet may affect the fitness of stone marten populations and play an important and still underreported role in regulating the relative abundance of marten communities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据