4.7 Article

Landscape ecological network construction controlling surface coal mining effect on landscape ecology: A case study of a mining city in semi-arid steppe

期刊

ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
卷 133, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108403

关键词

Landscape Ecological Network; Surface Coal Mine; Semi-Arid Steppe; Mining City; Multi-regulation Integration

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2021QN1058]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study proposed a framework for controlling the impact of surface coal mining on landscape ecology, using the minimum cumulative resistance model to simulate the landscape ecological network and improve landscape function in mining areas. This new approach helps prevent the impact of mining and promotes the self-restoration of mining cities in semi-arid steppes.
Surface coal mining leads to a series of landscape ecological disturbances and ecological environmental prob-lems. Landscape ecological network plays an important role in maintaining ecological balance, protecting biodiversity, preventing pollution diffusion, and increasing landscape connectivity. However, previous studies on the landscape ecological network of mining cities have not thoroughly considered the impact of mining on landscape ecology. This study proposed a framework of landscape ecological network construction controlling surface coal mining effect on landscape ecology. The minimum cumulative resistance model was used to simulate the landscape ecological network by constructing a resistance surface based on the multi-regulation integration. The newly constructed landscape ecological network is helpful for improving the landscape function of the mining areas, preventing the impact process of mining, and the self-restoration of mining cities in semi-arid steppes. The research results can provide a reference for the ecological restoration, urban planning, and land-scape ecological management of mining cities in semi-arid steppes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据