4.6 Article

The ecological waterfront design for Bufo bankorensis by using artificial neural network methods

期刊

ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
卷 170, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106335

关键词

Amphibian; Artificial Neural Network; Natural habitat

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amphibians are facing increasing threats due to loss of natural habitats caused by human activities, particularly in the development of solid banks along water bodies in Taiwan. Existing design solutions do not meet the needs of amphibians, emphasizing the urgent need for relevant design specifications.
Over the last three decades, the threat to amphibian animals has become more and more serious. Especially, the loss of natural habitats caused by changes to the way land is used by human beings. This issue has hit amphibians extraordinarily hard. Moreover, it is known that amphibians are particularly vulnerable to human activities because they rely on both terrestrial and aquatic habitats for survival. Due to increased development in many areas, concrete structures are often built along water bodies in order to increase the safety of structures. The development of solid banks along streams related with human improvement has become a major issue in Taiwan. Most ecosystems used by amphibians are lakes, ponds, rivers and stream banks. However, there is no related design solution to accommodate the needs of those amphibians. The need to develop the relevant design specification considering protecting the amphibian is very urgent. The objectives of this study were to investigate (1) the relationships between the physical characteristics and climbing ability of toads, (2) whether statistics analysis can be can be utilized to improve the understandings of the actual attributes of amphibian, (3) whether Artificial Neural Network can be used to simulate the climbing ability of toad. The experimental and numerical results showed that there is a strong positive correlation between physical characteristics and climbing ability of toads.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据