4.7 Article

On the relevance of values, norms, and economic preferences for electricity consumption

期刊

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
卷 192, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107264

关键词

Electricity consumption; Values; Norms; Economic preferences; Econometric analysis

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Edu-cation and Research [01UN1220B]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper empirically examines the relevance of multiple explanatory factors for electricity consumption based on data from over 3700 citizens in Germany. The study finds that individual housing and dwelling characteristics as well as socio-demographics have a significant impact on electricity consumption.
Based on data of more than 3700 citizens in Germany, this paper empirically examines the relevance of several groups of explanatory factors for electricity consumption. Besides controlling for individual housing and dwelling characteristics as well as socio-demographics, we analyze the effect of environmentally-related values and norms. Since behavioral economics reveals the importance of economic preferences for many individual activities, we additionally consider time and risk preferences, altruism, trust, and reciprocity in our econometric analysis. With respect to the latter factors, only patience has a significantly negative effect on electricity consumption. Instead, our estimation results suggest a high relevance of several individual housing and dwelling characteristics and socio-demographics. The most interesting result is probably that neither environmentally-related values such as ecological policy identification and environmental awareness nor environmentally-related personal and social norms have a significant effect. In contrast to the USA and to the demand for green electricity in Germany, these estimation results suggest that citizens with strong environmentally-related values and norms in Germany do not consider low electricity consumption as an important direction for environmental and climate protection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据