期刊
EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS
卷 225, 期 -, 页码 -出版社
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103892
关键词
Discussion; Radiocarbon dating; Radiocarbon simulation; Laacher See
Sweatman critiqued the evaluation of the YDIH and raised three points, but we proved that two of them were incorrect, and the third point had little effect on the results.
In his review of the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis (YDIH), Sweatman's (2021) critiques our simulation-based evaluation of the YDIH radiocarbon record (Jorgeson et al., 2020). He states that we compare dispersion in the radiocarbon datasets associated with the YDIH and the Laacher See volcanic eruption, that we do not account for old wood effects larger than 100 years, and that we do not account for recently published radiocarbon dates from Lake Hind. The first two critiques are incorrect, and we demonstrate that the third has an inconsequential effect on results.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据