4.7 Article

Thermal evolution of water and hydrogen from Apollo lunar regolith grains

期刊

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
卷 571, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2021.117107

关键词

water; hydrogen; recombinative desorption; activation energies; lunar regolith; volatiles

资金

  1. NASA Solar System Exploration Research Virtual Institute (SSERVI) [NNA17BF68A, NNA14AB02A]
  2. NASA [NNA14AB02A, 684756] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By conducting TPD experiments on Apollo lunar sample 15221, researchers found that water and hydrogen from lunar regolith contribute a minor amount to the observed mass in the LCROSS impact event. The abnormal amount of molecular hydrogen observed in the ejecta plume may be due to radiolytic production of H-2 from physisorbed water.
The evolution of water and molecular hydrogen from Apollo lunar sample 15221, a mature mare soil, was examined by temperature program desorption (TPD) experiments conducted under ultra-high vacuum conditions. Desorption at the grain/vacuum interface with re-adsorption as water transports though the void space of the grains and activated sub-surface diffusion were found to reproduce the experimental TPD signal. Signal from the grain/vacuum interface yielded the second order desorption activation energies and site probability distributions. Water from sample 15221 exhibited a broad distribution of activation energies peaking at 130 kJ mol(-1) extending up to 350 kJ mol(-1) at zero coverage limit with an onset of 110 kJ mol(-1) at full coverage. Our results suggest that water and hydrogen originating from lunar regolith contributes a minor amount to the observed mass in the LCROSS impact event. The abnormal amount of molecular hydrogen observed in the ejecta plume of the LCROSS impact may indicate that the radiolytic production of H-2 from electron and galatic cosmic rays of physisorbed water is a contributor to the vast quantity of molecular hydrogen detected. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据